Skip to main content

Trillions in platinum

It is silly season online with the same story popping up all over about solving the U.S. government’s debt problems by issuing two platinum coins worth $1 trillion each. This has been kicking around online for more than a year, but it has been gaining traction rapidly in the past week.

With the online imperative to publish the most headline-grabbing information possible, it is understandable that this story keeps popping up.

But if you are going to be outrageous to gain attention, why nibble around the edges?

The two $1 trillion platinum coins are supposedly justified as a means of dodging the spending restrictions that could result if the federal government’s debt ceiling is not raised shortly.

But why stop at two $1 trillion coins?

Why not strike one coin and put a $16 trillion denomination on it and declare that the nation has paid off all of its debt, or why not strike 16 $1 trillion coins if you like denominations in even numbers? Invite Lady Gaga to the debt retirement ceremony.

If you are going to employ silly logic to justify $2 trillion, the same silly logic also applies to $16 trillion.

Why stop there?

Why not strike enough coins to send every family in America a $1 trillion platinum coin? Everybody would probably would feel like a Rockefeller as they open the package, but when they attempted to buy lunch, they would discover that it costs $2.5 billion, or a meal in a nice restaurant would cost $25 billion. And those prices are good only for the next five minutes.

That’s what inflation does.

That’s why skittish investors have bid the price of gold up to $1,715 a troy ounce today, compared to $260 back in 2001. They worry about unlimited issuance of money. Historically, that worry is justified.

But the purpose of the $2 trillion story is not to initiate a logical discussion, but simply to call attention to itself.

It has succeeded.

Now when can I expect my $1 trillion coin in the mail?