• seperator

Too many varieties?

How many different varieties of coins can collectors keep track of?

I have raised this issue in the past because the three varieties of the American Eagles seemed to be confusing to many people.

One of the benefits of the Eagle planchet shortage was the elimination of the “W” collector version of the coins. It didn’t help that the Mint uses the term “uncirculated” in their name.

The standard bullion coin issue without the mintmark are just as uncirculated as the more expensive Mint collector version even if the Mint treats the planchet differently.

For most people the presence or absence of the mintmark is the only way to tell them apart.

Yesterday I received an e-mail where the sender did not know or was confused by the fact that the cents in last year’s collector proof sets and mint sets, etc., were made of the old 95-percent copper alloy that was used for the first Lincoln cents struck in 1909.

The idea of the copper composition is embedded in the 2005 authorizing law. It was considered to be a little something extra for collectors.

Something special for collectors sounds good, but from now on collectors will confuse the uncirculated mint set pieces with the standard copper-plated zinc circulation issues especially if they are out of the original packaging.

These little extra treats might give me something to write about it, but are they worth it to the hobby in the long run?

This entry was posted in Buzz. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Too many varieties?

  1. Scott says:

    The "W" mintmarked bullion coins should have been called matte proofs, because that’s really what they were. The details on "W" bullion coins are considerable better than regular bullion issue coins. I also don’t consider it a benefit to collectors that this series was dropped as these coins are really gorgeous when viewed under magnification.

Leave a Reply