Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<July 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

More Links


 Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Looking into space(s)
Posted by David

FW spacing varianceError notes have always been popular among collectors of U.S. small-size notes. Recently an e-mail came in that raises a question.

The correspondent, a 30-year collector of paper money and coins, spied a variance in spacing between the letters "FW" and the nearby plate position letters on two different Series 2003A $1 notes. (You should be able to see the difference in the image at right.)

The "FW" lettering, which appears at lower right on the front of the $1 note, is found on notes printed at the Fort Worth, Texas, production facility of the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Notes printed at the Washington, D.C., facility do not have the lettering.

I've asked the BEP for explanation, and I'll post what I learn in an update here. Feel free to chime in with your comments.

The question, though, is this: for paper money, just where do we draw the line between an error and a variety? Beyond that, will varieties be a big part of the future of small-size note collecting? Will grading services be expected to certify varieties? Which varieties?


UPDATE (May 9): Carol Riggs at the BEP's Fort Worth facility tells me "(t)here is no standard tolerance for variation in the spacing of the small 'FW' on the $1 face.  The engravers in Fort Worth use a visual measure to help them determine the approximate distance from the check letter." Specific to our example, she says "the quality of the engraving of the small 'FW' is clear, legible and functional and performs its job by designating that the note was produced in Fort Worth, Texas." Thanks, Carol!



4/25/2007 10:15:32 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)  #  Comments [3]
4/27/2007 10:00:27 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
This was discussed in some detail in a thread on the Where's George forums (let's see if I'm allowed to post a URL here):

http://forums.wheresgeorge.com/showthread.php?t=41209

Basically, it appears that the 2003A $1 Fort Worth master plate was rather sloppily engraved. There are several plate positions with unusually close spacing or unusually wide spacing between the "FW" and the plate letter. The sloppy spacing seems to be identical on all Fort Worth 2003A $1 plates; for example, positions D3 and A4 have the wide spacing on all observed plates, and position F1 has very close spacing.

That thread is almost a year old now, though, so it might be interesting to compare later-printing 2003A $1's from Fort Worth to see if the pattern holds up. I don't know whether a single master plate lasts the BEP through an entire series, or whether they have to replace it more often than that....

Anyway, hope this helps! :)
4/30/2007 10:22:02 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
That does help, thanks. How are people collecting these?
5/2/2007 8:20:16 PM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
To my knowledge, not much. As you can see in that forum discussion, once it became apparent that every observed 2003A $1 Fort Worth face plate had the erratic spacing, interest collapsed pretty quickly. There had initially been some thought that these might turn out to be the best thing since the FW295 error; but since the wide spacing appears on several notes per sheet--maybe 10-20% of all FW $1's in the series?--it seemed too common to be worthwhile.

Assembling a set of all 32 plate positions, for comparison purposes, might be an interesting project. Unfortunately, it's very easy to take a shortcut by just buying one of the BEP's uncut sheets that happens to be a Fort Worth printing, so once again there's not much of a challenge to hold collectors' attention.

There seems to be a pattern that, in order to become "collectible", an error or variety needs to be either visually impressive or fairly scarce, though not necessarily both. These spacing variations don't meet either condition, so I personally don't hold out a lot of hope for them ever becoming popular with collectors or listed in references.... Years from now, I predict they may rate an occasional three-sentence mention in your publication's answer-man column, but that's probably about all. (But if anyone out there *is* actively collecting them, I too would be interested to hear about it....)
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):