Free Updates

Let us tell you when new posts are added!

Email:

Navigation

Categories

Search

Archives

<July 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

More Links


 Wednesday, July 25, 2007
A 'wretchedly poor' coin—yawn!
Posted by bob

And the award for overly conservative and wretchedly honest coin grading goes to...

Of course, everyone knows that coin grading is subjective. All attempts to standardize coin grading have left something to be desired. Beauty remains in the eye of the beholder and for some the matter of a coin's grade is not a matter of beauty, it's the opposite.

One of my favorite lot descriptions in a coin auction included a prediction by an overzealous cataloger (prone to misusing words) that the given coin would no doubt bring a wave of "somnolence" over the auction floor. Thus, according to the auction company, everyone would likely fall asleep as soon as this coin was put up for sale. They can't really have meant this!

More brutally honest were the listings of Bangs, Merwin & Co., who took a unique marketing approach in grading coins for their Dec. 17, 1869, sale of the J.M. Wilbur collection. This nearly 2,000-lot auction featured 60 large cents dated 1847. The highest grade for any of the coins was "barely fair," while other were described by the cataloger, Edward Cogan, as "poor," "poorer," "worse," "extremely poor," "unusually poor," "wretchedly poor," "still worse," "exceedingly poor," and "poorer still."

Now these were coins that could have and should have brought a wave of sleepiness over the auction floor.



7/25/2007 4:54:26 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [2]
 Thursday, July 19, 2007
Kennedy half: Was it an entry wound?
Posted by bob

Many times bizarre rumors emerge about coins and continue to be repeated and repeated and repeated. When the Franklin half appeared, in 1948, some came to believe that 1967o.jpgthe "JRS" initials on the front of coin represented Joseph Stalin. A version of this tale was that a Communist was lurking in the U.S. Mint, who secretly placed Stalin's initials on the coin.

A more plausible explanation, and the correct one, is that "JRS" stood for the coin's designer, John R. Sinnock.

When the Kennedy half hit the streets, in 1964, some thought the stylized initials of Gilroy Roberts, designer of the coin's obverse, looked like Russia's hammer and sickle.

More stunning, however, was the claim that the placement of the stylized "GR" at truncation of the bust of Kennedy (above the "WE" in "IN GOD WE TRUST" marked the spot where one of Lee Harvey Oswald's bullets struck the president. Or, could the shot have come from someone on the grassy knoll?





7/19/2007 12:46:46 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Friday, July 06, 2007
Gasparro's original design the best
Posted by bob

I was packing for a move the other day, when I came across a Christmas card with a "thank you" from the late Frank Gasparro, former chief engraver of the U.S. Mint. 19999anthonyobv.jpg

Gasparro is known to collectors for designing the Memorial reverse on the Lincoln cent and the reverse of the Kennedy half dollar.

He is also recalled, not so fondly, for his depiction on the nation's first mini-dollar (1979-1981, 1999) of famous 19th-century advocate of woman's suffrage, Susan B. Anthony. In fairness to Gasparro, the design looks like Anthony, and Gasparro was mandated by the act authorizing the coin to depict her on the coin's obverse.

What should be remembered is that Gasparro preferred a much different design for the new dollar—one of his own, which was reminiscent of early U.S. coins. It showed a flowing haicm0621.jpgr Liberty on the obverse and an eagle in flight on the reverse.

At the time, I was on the staff of Numismatic News and wrote a regular column called "Striking Impressions." I liked Gasparro's original design, showed it in my column, and said so. It wasn't long after that I received the card and "thank you" for my comments on his design, which I've kept since in a display cabinet.

I still think Gasparro's design would have been a better choice (see the accompanying picture of Gasparro with his models). Though I doubt it would have made any difference as to how well the coin circulated.





7/6/2007 3:59:29 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Thursday, July 05, 2007
America's 'flapper' dollar
Posted by bob

Do you know which U.S. coin was called the "flapper" dollar? It was the coin now known as the Peace dollar for its "PEACE" declaration at the bottom of its reverse—in reference to the CS15b.jpgend of World War I.

In early 1922, when the Peace dollar (first minted with a 1921 date) was introduced into circulation, not everyone was impressed the Anthony de Francisci's design. It wasn't because he used his wife, Theresa, as a general model for Liberty on the coin's obverse. Few would know this until much later. In fact, she's not a bad looking Liberty.

No, it was the Wall Street Journal that took exception to the design, terming it a "flapper" dollar.

"If words were issued from her lips they would hardly take the moreCS15a.jpg elegant languor of 'Line's bizzay!" the Journal wrote. "They would more probably be, 'Say, lissen!'"

The paper called for the coin's redesign, suggesting that it be withdrawn from circulation and a new design commissioned through a nationwide competition. It lamented that the design was no better than a magazine cover.

Despite this criticism, the Peace dollar continued to be coined until 1935, long after the last flapper donned her "glad rags" for a night out.

Today common dates of the "flapper" dollar can easily be found less than $20 in circulated grades.



7/5/2007 3:55:31 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [0]
 Monday, July 02, 2007
20-cent piece two 'bits' of history
Posted by bob

One of the more interesting stories about the short-lived U.S. 20-cent piece, introduced into circulation in 1875, can be found in a classic 1876 book related to Virginia City, Nev.'s famous Comstock Lode. It's titled The Big Bonanza and was written by Dan De Quille (William Wright), editor of the Virginia City Territorial Enterprise and a good friend of Mark Twain.
cm1111-a.jpg
The 20-cent piece was produced for use primarily in the West, where small change was in short supply. Its primary backer was Nevada Sen. John Percival Jones, a veteran of the Comstock, and it received support from those few who advocated a metric coinage system and others who thought the coin might help absorb some of the oversupply of silver then weighing down the country.

That it would be of some use, at least in Western saloons, was clearly shown by De Quille. In his chapter, "Saloon Birds," De Quille explained that Virginia City had about 100 saloons (a high number, but one that went with satisfying the demands of thirsty, hardworking hardrock miners), most of which were what was called "bit" houses, where "...drinks of all kinds and cigars are one bit—twelve and one half cents. The dime, however, passes as a 'bit' in all of these houses."

Being short of 12 1/2 cents, De Quille explained, it was sometimes referred to as a "short bit," but was still considered the equal of half of the quarter. Thus, in a bit house, whenever a customer tendered a quarter for his cigar or drink, he got back a dime, losing five centcm1111-b.jpgs in the transaction. Jones' 20-cent piece, De Quille assured, would cure this ill.

It wasn't a problem in the two-bit houses, as everything there went for a quarter, even, De Quille observed, that which sold in the bit houses for 10 cents, including beer, soda water and lemonade. However, in some cases, ambiance was apparently all you were getting in choosing the two-bit house over the one-bit house, as evidenced by the following passage from The Big Bonanza.

"A man one day sauntered into a two-bit saloon and called for drink of whisky. The proprietor of the place was behind the bar and set out the bourbon bottle. When the man had drunk he threw a ten-cent piece on the counter and started off.

'This is a two-bit house, sir,' said the proprietor in a tone which showed that he felt pride in the establishment.

'Ah!' said the customer. 'Two bit house, eh? Well, I thought so when I came in, but after I had tasted your whisky I concluded it was a bit house."

Despite its importance to those who populated Virginia City's at times raucous drinking establishments, the 20-cent piece was not popular with much of the rest of the public. Being too close in size and design to the 25-cent piece, it was often confused and therefore shunned. Coinage ended in 1878, two short years, or a bit, after it began.




7/2/2007 1:04:51 PM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)  #  Comments [1]