• seperator

Hoarding is not a fine art

Nickel hoarding: is this the coming thing?

After my comments on Friday, I received several e-mails from an online blogger who is recommending the hoarding of nickels.

He wondered what dates or conditions I might recommend. Should they be proofs? Should they be MS-67s?

I told him I had no suggestions along those lines, except to say that as a collector, Jefferson nickels have been pretty well dead since the roll and bag boom ended as 1964 came to a close. I thought collectors should focus on the 1938-1945 dates.

However, as I think about it more, it seems to me to be foolish to mix up the collecting impulse and the hoarding impulse.

If your case to keep the nickels is that the prices of copper and nickel will rise so much that it will be profitable (and no longer illegal as it presently is) to melt the coins, any coin will do. Trying to find top grades in quantity will simply slow you down and reduce your eventual profit.

Will collectors 20 years from now care  whether tens of millions of nickels from the 1980s, 1990s or 2000s are MS-67? I doubt it. If they are common, they will be priced like common coins.

Back in the late 1970s, I used to sort through silver coins sold as bullion. I pulled a number of G-VG 1937-S quarters out to keep.

Surely this scarce date should not be melted, I reasoned, and surely future collectors will price it as a better date.

OK. I am still waiting. The 1964-D has gone up as much in price since then.

The lesson?

Hoarding is hoarding and collecting is collecting. The two are not the same thing.

If you want to hoard nickels, go for it. Don’t worry about the grades.

This entry was posted in Buzz. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply