Free Updates
Navigation
Categories
| May, 2008 (13) |
| April, 2008 (22) |
| March, 2008 (21) |
| February, 2008 (22) |
| January, 2008 (23) |
| December, 2007 (19) |
| November, 2007 (20) |
| October, 2007 (24) |
| September, 2007 (18) |
| August, 2007 (23) |
| July, 2007 (24) |
| June, 2007 (21) |
| May, 2007 (23) |
| April, 2007 (3) |
Search
Archives
More Links
|
 Monday, March 31, 2008
I see it in my mind’s eye
Posted by dave
I have never had the pleasure of visiting the state of New Mexico. I seem to recall that my uncle’s green 1960 Ford station wagon had a sticker in the back window indicating that he, my aunt and two cousins had made it there on a visit once. I have known people from New Mexico and others who moved there to retire. I have even read about it in books about hot retirement places. The American Numismatic Association has even had a show there in Albuquerque during my career, but my travels have never taken me there. It is funny how these thoughts pop into my head when I think about the New Mexico state quarter that will be released April 7. But then, that is part of the point. Collecting coins is as much about the person who is doing the collecting as the coins themselves. The New Mexico quarter will educate Americans about a state that entered the Union in 1912 and its Zia sun symbol design. But every American who acquires one of the new quarters and takes a moment to look at it will make the coin his or her own by the thoughts that come to be associated with it. Will they know where New Mexico is? Do they know the name of the governor? It is fortunate for the hobby that Gov. Bill Richardson thinks the coin is important enough to head the state’s dignitaries in introducing the quarter with Mint Director Ed Moy. Richardson has the honor of having been in the cabinet in Washington, D.C., when the program was authorized by Congress and now is a participant near the conclusion of its 10-year run. New Mexico’s motto is “Land of Enchantment.” Enchantment is a good word describing the basic appeal of coin collecting, don’t you think?
3/31/2008 9:00:09 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, March 28, 2008
Off to Connecticut
Posted by Dave
I have to pack my bags to head out to Willimantic, Conn. I will be attending the Mansfield Numismatic Society show there on Sunday. It is a great opportunity for me to see and visit with hobbyists on the East Coast in a setting that is not as rushed as a major numismatic event like the American Numismatic Association World’s Fair of Money, which is coming up in July in Baltimore. The ANA conventions are certainly important and enjoyable, but the sheer business of being busy at the national convention can impede the spontaneous interactions that make collecting such an interesting pursuit. If you happen to be within driving distance of the show, you might consider putting it on your list of weekend things to do. It is in the Gymnasium Building at 233 Prospect St. Admission is free, so bring the family. I am looking forward to it.
3/28/2008 8:57:02 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, March 27, 2008
Regard for medals rising?
Posted by Dave
In my collecting career, medals have been the stepchildren to coins. Most collectors I knew years ago had no interest in them. After all, they weren’t coins. They were second class. That may sound a little harsh, but the words capture the attitude. Sure there are niche collectors of Inaugural medals and other things. Generalists will become reacquainted with them as we near the Jan. 20, 2009, inauguration of the next President. The quadrennial bloom will be on that particular rose. Nearly 30 years ago the John Wayne medal took the hobby by storm. I didn’t buy one, but I remember reporting on the phenomenon. I raise this particular topic this morning as I look at the sales totals for First Spouse bronze medals. We know the gold coins for Martha Washington, Abigail Adams and Miss Liberty standing in for Mrs. Jefferson sold out in hours. Those totaled 40,000 apiece. The bronze medal sales totals for the same three are 39,016, 36,426 and 34,268. Buyers of these pay far less for the same design as appears on the gold coins – just $3.50. But there is no real hope of making any kind of speculative profit, so the purchasing impulse has more to do with the collector impulse and the simple pleasure in owning them. Those totals rise by 50 percent if you count the pieces included in the 2007 Presidential $1 Coin and First Spouse Medal Sets. These were priced at $7.95 each. Admittedly, these totals are small when compared to, say, the 480,176 Presidential $1 Coin Proof Sets sold so far for 2008, but they strike me as significant. Now I am tainted by my generational attitudes to medals. Has that attitude been thrown off by newcomers who have no memory of circulation finds, proof Ike dollars and the first U.S. Olympic coins? Perhaps. What do you think?
3/27/2008 8:59:28 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Cooper's parachute enhances note values
Posted by Dave
Coincidences make news a fascinating business. In the March Bank Note Reporter and elsewhere we reported that PCGS Currrency had certified two dozen $20 Federal Reserve Notes that had been part of the $200,000 ransom money given to D.B. Cooper in 1971. Cooper was a plane hijacker who parachuted out of 727 in the Pacific Northwest and was never heard from again. Did he get away? Did he die from trying to parachute from such a high altitude? These questions have been festering for nearly 40 years. Now look at the news this morning. The Cooper parachute may have been found in Washington State. It is a coincidence, but what an extraordinary one it is. Slab ransom money. Discover parachute a few short weeks later. The two events make a fascinating coincidence. The coincidence undoubtedly enhances the value of the notes. By how much, I will be curious to discover. I also expect we will learn more as time goes on about the hijacking itself and whether the parachute really was Cooper's, but PCGS Currency certainly was very lucky in its timing. Congratulations on a PR coup.
3/26/2008 9:01:10 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 25, 2008
That promise was golden
Posted by Dave
Election years bring out politicians and campaign promises. Normally, these do not touch upon numismatics, but 28 years ago this week, candidate Ronald Reagan made an appearance 13 miles to the south of Iola in Courthouse Square in Waupaca. I was there. I listened to his speech. Incorporated into it was a promise to make the U.S. dollar as good as gold again. That is not exactly an overt pledge to restore the gold standard that was abandoned in 1933 or the gold exchange standard that was abandoned in 1971, but it was as close to the subject as any American leader who had a strong chance of winning the presidency has ever gone since President Nixon closed the gold window. He was as good as his word. He appointed the U.S. Gold Commission. Its report in 1982 did not bring back the gold standard, but it did make the topic a respectable one in government circles again, something that had not been the case for the prior decade. The door was opened to striking gold coins again. The Olympic coin legislation had a $10 gold coin component and it was not laughed out of Congress or condemned. It passed and the Olympic $10 of 1984 was the first American gold coin struck since 1933. It sold reasonably well to collectors. It was followed by the 1986 Statue of Liberty $5, which sold out in just a few weeks. It was a first hint of pent-up gold coin demand. This was then followed by the creation of the American Eagle program in 1986 and we were off to the races. The gold standard did not come back but Americans were given an American option to invest in if they wanted gold to be a part of their investments. Perhaps someday a candidate who has more electoral pull than Ron Paul will say something positive about gold or some other numismatic subject.
3/25/2008 9:01:51 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, March 24, 2008
Let's play hot potato
Posted by Dave
Tom Snyder in Waukesha, Wis., gets the credit for being the first person to report to me his receipt of one of the new $5 Federal Reserve Notes. As he reports by e-mail, “It was spent by the customer ahead of me at McDonalds and the clerk was having a problem accepting it when the guy told her it was a new one. I, the next customer, agreed and so she accepted the note, but quickly paid it back out to me in my change.” This raises the usual questions about the lack of awareness of many of Americans of their money. Fortunately for the clerk’s peace of mind, she could treat the new bill like a hot potato and quickly pass it to Tom, who could report it to me and the rest of the collecting community. That got me thinking along historical channels about the economy. During the Depression of the 1930s there were many unorthodox thoughts about how to get the economy moving again. One method was to spend into circulation pieces of paper that weren’t money but passed as money. The technical term is scrip. The kicker, though, was this scrip expired, so the point was to spend it as quickly as possible. It was thought that these quick expenditures would help jump start demand much like the recently enacted stimulus package that will be paid out in May. This was before John Maynard Keynes formalized the Keynesian economic theory of demand management through public expenditure to keep economies going. Perhaps we can get the rest of the public to treat the new notes like hot potatoes and spend them more quickly. No? Well, that’s the best I can do on a Monday morning this week.
3/24/2008 9:04:22 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, March 21, 2008
Buyers put money where mouths are
Posted by Dave
Physical buyers of gold and silver coins think the present decline in the precious metals are merely corrections in a long-term uptrend. How do I know? Well, I could read commentary in various online newsgroups, but more importantly, I can look at what is going on in the market itself. I talked to Julian Jarvis yesterday. He told me that, “Everybody’s trying to buy physicals and nobody is trying to sell today.” He makes a market in physical bullion coins from his Indiana office. The net result is a mad scramble to find supplies. Buyers, supposedly, are trying to lock in the present lower prices. Gold dropped from the highs by more than $80 if we use closing prices not intraday levels and silver has fallen by nearly $5. For silver especially, those numbers are large. American Precious Metals Exchange, which operates a Web site that sells precious metals was overloaded and Scott Thomas posted notice that persons who were interested in transactions of more than $2,500 should telephone his Oklahoma office instead. It was an interesting coincidence in timing, because I interviewed Thomas on Coin Chat Radio. Broadcast yesterday online, he warned people to buy into the market in chunks rather than jumping in with everything all at once and he forecast gold at $1,500 an ounce in one year and silver at $35. The interview occurred before the price declines had hit and yesterday’s market action got going. Clearly there are more individuals besides Thomas who believe that prices are going higher or the scramble would have been all on the other side – selling rather than buying. Will these would-be buyers yesterday prove to be right? Well, there are no guarantees, but I put more stock in the opinions of people who are putting up their money to play the investment game rather than those who simply offer a coffee break opinion.
3/21/2008 9:08:35 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, March 20, 2008
Gold or poetry
Posted by Dave
I can choose gold as my topic this morning or I can mention the phone call I received yesterday from a fellow who wondered if I published poetry. I responded to the inquiry that occasionally I will run something in the letters section if it relates to coins, but I certainly wasn’t interested in buying anything. His reply was it was a love poem that mentions Queen Victoria. Are you ready for gold? Yeah, me too. It would seem that investors have once again had an attack of round-number-itis. The $1,000 level for gold was such a shock, pleasant reality, target point or whatever that the price plunged, down now by more than $80. I expect there will be a great deal of dissection of this event, but it will be helpful to remember that the big innovation for gold buyers in this cycle was the creation of exchange traded funds, or ETF’s, which allow persons unfamiliar with commodity markets or coin dealers to get in on the action. ETF’s are convenient, but when Wall Street gets involved with gold or coins, we in numismatics get involved in Wall Street’s problems. Individuals and firms who have taken a bath with their investments in the banking industry and bank-generated mortgage securities might have been eying their gold holdings as salable to raise funds to shore up their overall financial positions, or to meet margin calls. This kind of activity has nothing to do with underlying fundamentals – at least initially. We will learn if this is a temporary hiccup or the start of a new trend lower, but only over time. The present fall is not anything like as severe as the decline of the first two days from the 1980 peak, so this could very easily be nothing more than a routine price fluctuation. There. Gold or poetry? Perhaps we will find someone who says gold is poetry.
3/20/2008 9:00:00 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 19, 2008
How many coins in the cupboard?
Posted by Dave
Final mintages of Dolley Madison First spouse gold coins are not available, but pending the usual accounting finalization procedures that can take months, the sales totals stand at 10,400 uncirculateds and 16,268 proofs. The uncirculated coin went off sale within four days of the uncirculated Elizabeth Monroe pieces going on sale for $90 more and the proofs hung on for nearly two weeks more with the same cost differential. During the parallel sales period fewer than 400 more uncirculated Madison coins were sold and about 1,000 proofs were purchased. What does this tell us? Well, perhaps it is just a matter of repricing. Or it could give us an idea that the Mint is not striking coins significantly ahead of demand. Theoretically, before 2007 ended the Mint could have struck right up to the 40,000 total limit and kept them on sale until they were sold or until they got tired of holding them in inventory. It is clear the Mint does not want large inventories. That is certainly a good business practice. In the event perhaps final mintages will total right around 26,668. This would explain why more and more Mint coin offers start with a sales period and a message that the coins are available for delivery days or weeks later. The 2008-W uncirculated silver Eagle went on sale March 17 with a message that they will not be available until April 9. Waiting a few extra days is a good thing for collectors, too, because it means there is less chance that the secondary market will be perpetually distorted by unwanted Mint inventories. In contrast to current sales of 2001 Kennedy half dollars, there won’t be 2007 Madison First Spouse coins being offered by the Mint in 2014.
3/19/2008 9:05:51 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 18, 2008
Get a new $5 yet?
Posted by Dave
Have you gotten a new $5 Federal Reserve Note in your change yet? The new bill was introduced last week on March 13. It has not made it to Iola yet. Debbie Bradley inquired about it after the official introduction when she did some routine banking. Lack of the new $5s in Iola is no real surprise. We are at the tail end of the distribution system and I sometimes think that old $1 bills come here to die because they can be so ratty. Nobody wins any prizes for being the first to get one in change, but there is a certain psychological satisfaction in being the first to report one to fellow collectors and passing a personal judgment on how it looks and whether the anti-counterfeiting devices are easy to use. Americans are not easily educated about money. That is peculiar considering how important money is to everyday life. The iodine pens increasingly shorten the useful life of many bills. There is far less thinking involved with a pen than checking a security strip or a watermark. The need for fairly crisp examples in ATM machines adds further strain. Then there is the simple fact of the new designs themselves. It used to be said that $100 bills had a life of 18 years. Well, that isn’t true anymore. The new design arrived in 1996 and the old designs disappeared very rapidly, led by an almost complete rejection of the old designs in places like Russia as soon as the new ones appeared. When the next new one comes out, I expect a similar departure schedule for the current notes. How long will the current $5 last in the face of the arrival of the new? Not long, I imagine. Next year I will probably ask whether anyone is seeing any old notes in their change.
3/18/2008 8:53:56 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, March 17, 2008
What's the demand for numismatic art?
Posted by Dave
I owe thanks to the individuals who posted comments with my blog on Friday. It is great to receive helpful information and commentary from readers. Gold at $1,000 an ounce is an important milestone and it is important that people generally be aware of it. One thing where gold at $1,000 an ounce will not be helpful is in the realm of a new Mint project to recreate the ultra-high-relief Saint-Gaudens gold $20 produced in 1907 at the U.S. Mint from dies bearing the famous design of Augustus Saint-Gaudens. The coin proved so difficult to strike at the time that it was quickly abandoned for the high relief versions and mere commerce caused that design to be abandoned because bankers said they would not stack properly. Assuming the Mint succeeds in the production challenges and the fact that the coins will never see commerce, that leaves the problem of projected price. What will it cost the Mint to create the numismatic masterpiece? The base gold value if struck today would be $1,000 plus whatever the markup would be to cover the Mint’s cost and add a little profit. Basic American Eagle proofs are $1,200 from the Mint using a round number. How much more would this special coin be? $1,300, $1,400, or $1,500? In that rarefied pricing area, there are not too many collector buyers, unless of course, they can turn them around and sell them on eBay before the credit card is debited and the coin is shipped. If it can be sold on eBay, great, it is a profit. If it can’t be, it gets shipped back to the Mint within the 30-day return privilege. Back to the basic question: what is the rock bottom collector demand for such a piece? I know that it is more than the 19 ulta-high-reliefs that the Mint press release notes exist from 1907. It is probably in the thousands of pieces, because a first-time issue frequently inspires more buyers than a second. But, using the $1,500 price for easy figuring, a mintage of 10,000 would generate the Mint $15 million in sales. Could it go higher than that? What do you think?
3/17/2008 9:01:31 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, March 14, 2008
What's that about $1,000 gold?
Posted by Dave
Various news organizations seem so anxious to reach the nice round number of $1,000 gold that they seem to have prematurely announced it yesterday. The actual close was $992.30 and as far as I can see, trading in spot gold, that is for immediate delivery, did not hit the magical round number. Market psychology is a strange thing. Traders and investors are often attracted to round numbers. There is no practical difference between $1,000 and $997 or $998 unless your gold holdings are of Fort Knox proportions. The milestone will or won’t be reached. My earliest memories of the stock market come from just after the 1966 attempt to reach 1,000 on the Dow Jones Industrial Average. It was close but no cigar and it wasn’t until 1972 before it actually breached the historical barrier. It was 10 years after that before it made a decisive breakthrough upward. Do I see parallels? There are a few. The market enthusiasm seems awfully high. The disappointment at not achieving a breach of the barrier might give some sellers the courage to sell and hesitant buyers enough worry to discourage them. We will see. I write this knowing that I could be completely wrong as soon as formal morning trading begins. But of course, $1,000 gold has already been proclaimed by many news organizations.
3/14/2008 9:01:54 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Thursday, March 13, 2008
Steel to make coinage comeback
Posted by Dave
Steel cents are in our future. The only thing is, they won’t look like steel cents. This isn’t as strange as it may sound. We already have zinc cents that don’t look like zinc cents. The steel concept is the same. The core will be coated or bonded to an outer layer of copper so the public will not be able to visually detect the difference. At issue is timing. There are two bills in Congress. At a hearing on Tuesday the divisions became clear. One bill gave discretionary authority over coin composition to the Treasury secretary. The other essentially leaves that power in the hands of Congress unless an extensive round of consulting and public input occurs. Which is Congress likely to go for? My money is on the one where it retains the most power. What they agree on though is the necessity of changing the cent’s composition. That brings us back to steel and timing. It will be around two years before the Mint can line up all of its ducks and suppliers. That seems slow, but that is what the Mint director said. We live in an Internet age where we figure if we can conceive of it, it will be done. The Mint operates industrial plants and things don’t move that quickly. The new composition will save taxpayers money. Any changes to the other denominations depend on which of the two pieces of legislation passes. Let’s watch and see.
3/13/2008 9:01:15 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Car disrupts morning routine
Posted by Dave
My morning routine was disrupted today. I dashed out the door as usual. I got in the car. I put the key in the ignition – nothing. The mechanism would not unlock. I fooled around with it, jiggling the key and putting it in and taking in out in rapid succession. Still, there was nothing. After trying this several times over the course of a half hour, I called the office. Debbie Bradley came to my rescue and picked me up. That is the advantage of living in a community of 1,300 people. I was not miles away. So here I am, happily at my desk, slightly behind but up and at ’em as the phrase goes. What’s going on in the numismatic world? Well, I haven’t caught up yet. If there is an urgent topic, I will be back again with another posting. If not, I will try again tomorrow to achieve a normal day. Oh. Wish me luck getting my car going.
3/12/2008 9:26:25 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 11, 2008
CoinChat Radio ready to air
Posted by dave
Preparations for CoinChat Radio are in high gear in the office. The first program will be broadcast online at 11 a.m. Friday morning Central Daylight Time. Mark your calendar. It has been great fun putting it all together. I hope you will be listening to it then or when it repeats at the top of each hour. You can access it at www.CoinChatRadio.com. I do an interview with Texas collector Reed Hawn and talk a little bit about a coin he once owned, an 1804 dollar that will hit the market again at auction in April and the Central States convention. Those who are interested in the precious metals markets will have the opportunity to hear my interview of Pat Heller of Liberty Coin Service. Pat shares his thoughts about gold, platinum and silver. The best part, of course, is if you like what you hear, Pat has agreed to come back. It is a deep subject and in a few minutes in an initial interview, I simply wanted to hear more. I hope you do as well. The program has much more packed into it with contributions by Dave Kranz, Debbie Bradley, Lisa Bellavin and Maggie Pahl and Bob Van Ryzin, who also introduces the rest of us. I don’t want to give it all away. So listen in on Friday. If you do, let me know what you think. Point out the good and the bad. Then all of us can give you more of what you find interesting and useful and less of what you don’t like. My e-mail is david.harper@fwpubs.com.
3/11/2008 8:52:14 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Monday, March 10, 2008
Back in the office
Posted by dave
Sleep took priority over my blog this morning. I got home about 1:30 this morning, returning from the National Money Show in Phoenix. I was not particularly late. However, at that hour of the morning every extra minute seems to be worth at least two or three. To cover the Krause table until 2 p.m. and then to fly east means a late arrival home no matter what. Had everything gone exactly right, I could not have made it any earlier than 12:30 a.m. So I slept two hours later than usual this morning. What do I think of the goings on in Phoenix? Well, ANA has a new executive direct in Larry Shepherd. Reaction seems very favorable, but it is possible to find one or two dissenters from the majority opinion. The public showed up in force. Many dealers commented on it. Business in general was considered a bit slow. Some blamed the heavy schedule of Las Vegas, Long Beach, Baltimore and then Phoenix on consecutive weekends. Some dealers just didn’t make it to Phoenix as a result. The Tennessee state show kept others away and snowstorms did the rest. Platinum took a header and gold didn’t make it through $1,000, so that prompted a little bit of caution. I did 12 radio interviews for our new CoinChat Radio, which is set to air for the first time on Friday. Perhaps “air” is an archaic term. It is going out online. I hope you get a chance to listen to it. I am sure you will see more about it elsewhere on the Web site. That’s it for now.
3/10/2008 10:49:31 AM (Eastern Daylight Time, UTC-04:00)
|
|
 Friday, March 07, 2008
How sweet it is
Posted by dave
Remember Jackie Gleason? Well, his signature phrase popped into my head here in Phoenix. It is good to be with active hobbyists in a very pleasant setting. Winter won’t give up in Wisconsin. Snow is still piled high. Spring is coming. However it doesn’t take seasonal optimism to be pleased with numismatic business conditions. Nobody knows how long the good times will last, but all of the signs keep pointing to continuing high levels of interest and ever rising prices for truly collectible coins. If you know where inflation is going and how hard any recession might bite, you will have an idea of how long the good times can last. Back in 1979-1980, the boom was called “The Party” by dealers. We don’t seem to have a name for this particular period. When we find one, I hope it will last longer.
3/7/2008 3:24:37 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Thursday, March 06, 2008
On my way to Phoenix
Posted by dave
With silver up nearly a buck yesterday and approaching $21 an ounce in value, it should be interesting to see what the effect might be on bourse activity at the American Numismatic Association National Money Show in Phoenix. As you have probably guessed, I am en route to the show. If the airlines and weather allow, I am due to reach my destination about lunch time. Dealers set up starting at 3 p.m. in the afternoon. In addition to seeing what goes on at the bourse, one of my main purposes will be to cover the ANA board meetings. The good news for me in terms of time spent is that the public meeting lasts just three hours. The bad news is that those three hours are at 3-6 p.m. tomorrow. This will keep me off the bourse floor then. The board has a heavy agenda, including the adoption of the annual budge in public session. In the many private meeting hours, the board was spending all day Wednesday interviewing candidates for the position of executive director. More executive session hours are scheduled for today as well and there will be a town hall meeting Saturday night. Who will want to help straighten out the budget and work to get the ANA out of deficit in future years? That is a key question for the board. This task is daunting enough, but the various lawsuits overhanging the organization make budget projections very difficult if not impossible. The only recourse is massive layoffs or dipping further into the endowment fund. The latter is the likely outcome, and I will be there to watch the public portion of the decision-making process. Any guesses as to just how big the ANA deficit will be?
3/6/2008 9:24:43 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Wednesday, March 05, 2008
In the blink of an eye
Posted by Dave
I received an e-mail yesterday about the Dolley Madison First Spouse coins. The writer told me that the Madison uncirculated coin was unavailable from the Mint. That is the first word that I had that the Mint had taken the coin down. It was available Monday when I checked. He is right. It was down when he e-mailed me. I had posted a blog Feb. 26 that noted what I thought was somewhat peculiar. The Madison coins were being offered at prices $90 less than the new Monroe coins when they went on sale Feb. 28. I also wrote a story for last week’s print edition of Numismatic News. For at least four days, the two uncirculated First Spouse designs, Madison and Monroe, were offered. The two proofs have been simultaneously offered at different price levels now for six days. I appreciate reader input. I was initially somewhat baffled by the writer’s line: “Contrary to your online info.” Then I checked. I saw that last week’s print version of the story had magically appeared on the Numismatic News Web site dated March 4. That does raise certain issues when markets are moving fast. Stories are true when they are written for the print edition and when they are posted online. Conditions change. Sometimes they change rapidly. Stories and postings pass into history. There they stand. Some just become obsolete quicker than others. This is the record so far. How long the proof Dolley Madison First Spouse coin will remain on sale more cheaply than the Elizabeth Madison remains an active question. If you are thinking about buying, you might want to make your decision quickly.
3/5/2008 8:58:26 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Tuesday, March 04, 2008
Cent on way out?
Posted by Dave
With the 200th anniversary of the birth of Abraham Lincoln occurring next year and the 100th anniversary mark being attained by the Lincoln cent, there is a lot of talk going on in hobby circles about the lowest current U.S. coin denomination. Its future is rather bleak. Inflation is killing it, aided by changing purchasing habits of Americans. It is far easier to swipe a credit or debit card through the reader and give an electronic signature than it is to count out cash and wait for change. Using cards also eliminates many trips to the bank or ATM to replenish cash walking around money. Since the peak production at the height of the last economic boom in the year 2000, cent production has not ever returned to the approximately 14 billion that were struck in that year. In fact, last year’s production of roughly 7.4 billion cents had actually fallen from the approximately 8.2 billion of the year before. Part of this can be attributed to the slowing economy, but not all of it. In prior cycles, coinage peaks in one cycle were regularly exceeded in the following cycle. Not this time. Americans may be voluntarily abandoning the denomination. Such a death by natural causes is far preferable to political murder. As the Treasury secretary found out Friday when he told a radio program that his personal opinion was he would like to get rid of the cent. The usual howls went up even as he told the same interviewer that it wasn’t politically doable. Why raise the issue at all? Good question. What do you think?
3/4/2008 8:58:36 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
 Monday, March 03, 2008
Sounds of silence
Posted by Dave
Silver is trading over $20 an ounce as this is written. Wow. That’s up by more than one-third since the year 2007 ended at $14.797. Gold is not yet at $1,000, but can this milestone be far behind? It began the year at just over $834.90. What’s the Treasury doing about it? Nothing I can see. Should it? That I even ask such a question may be a generational disconnect. It used to be that the Treasury was terribly concerned about the price of precious metals. In the 1960s, the Treasury dumped huge quantities of what had been a 2-billion-ounce hoard of silver to try to maintain its official price of $1.2929. Same with gold. Large amounts went into maintaining the $35-an-ounce figure. The sense of crisis and the public pronouncements all indicated officials considered something amiss. The free market eventually won, but it was treated like a course of castor oil – unpleasant but necessary. Even in 1979-1980, there was a sense of crisis despite the fact that the markets were free. Interest rates were raised to tamp down speculation. One Federal Reserve chairman was pushed out and another, Paul Volcker, was put in his place. Not this time. It’s different. Buyers of gold and silver are starting to sound like buyers of real estate did two years ago. You can’t lose, they say. The similarity is unsettling. That is perhaps why the echoes of the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s are in my ears. They may be part of the past, but are all of their lessons now irrelevant?
3/3/2008 9:03:32 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00)
|
|
|